What follows is a table of genetic correspondences rather than phonetic correspondences, the latter being much less exact and more changeable. Systematic genetic correspondences are possible because the Hebrew, Greek and Roman alphabets derive from a common source, the North Semitic alphabet of c.1700 BCE. The Roman comes to us via Etruscan and Greek c.800 BCE, and the Greek comes via Phoenician, c.1000 BCE. In this sense Aleph, Alpha and A are in essence the same letter.
It's worth noting that the Modern Hebrew alphabet, which is commonly used in esoteric work, is no closer in form to the original alphabet than are the Greek or Roman alphabets. Indeed, the Old Hebrew alphabet (c. 900 BCE) looks much more like the Early Greek alphabet than it looks like Modern Hebrew. Therefore I see no reason to believe that the Modern Hebrew alphabet has more "magical potency" than the Greek or Roman alphabets. (See also "Some Notes on the History of Isopsephia (Gematria)".)
*2 San, corresponding to Sade, was used in some early
Greek alphabets for an S sound. It is often taken to be
equivalent to Sampi (also an obsolete S sound), and so
it's reasonable to assign it the numerical value 900.
*3 There is no Roman letter genetically related to
Teth/Theta.
*4 There is no Roman letter genetically related to
Sade/San.
*5 The Roman letter X derives from the Greek letter
now called Chi, which is identical in shape. This is
because the Roman alphabet developed from an early
Greek alphabet in which the letter shaped X (with
numerical value 600) had the sound /ks/. In the
classical Greek alphabet this letter had the sound
/kh/, whence its name Chi. The Greek letter Xi,
which had the sound /ks/ in the classical alphabet
(but not in the alphabet from which the Roman alphabet
derives), is unrelated to Roman X, and in fact looks
nothing like it.
References
Return to Biblioteca Arcana page
Last updated:
Tue Jun 17 09:22:43 EDT 1997